shutterstock_1124433791

Kamala or Bust?

California U.S. Senator Kamala Harris (D) is running for President of the United States. So are three other women.  She is joining a field of candidates who will be nothing short of amazing. Women and men of color are declaring their candidacies and that in itself is historic.  What’s also historic is 2020 will have more women candidates run than ever before.  There are so many positives to celebrate, but Democrats are too busy tearing down their own candidates before any debates even start.

Specifically, there’s lots of debate around Kamala. She’s a historically black college or university (HBCU) graduate, born to immigrant parents, pledged a Panhellenic sorority, Alpha Kappa Alpha, Inc. and most notably the former top cop of California, having served as the State’s Attorney General.

We can now dismiss with the pleasantries because the not-Kamala-choir is ready to sing. Since she made her presidential announcement, which was literally 2 days ago on the Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday, several articles have come out about her. Some are in support, but many are critical of her record as San Francisco Attorney General and her state role as Attorney General.  Even more, there has been a ton of social media traffic about her race. And even more than the social media traffic is the HBCU stans and notably Howard University graduates and students who are vehemently defending her existence.

As a graduate of an HBCU, I understand the pride that comes with seeing one of our own run for any elected office, let alone running for president. And as a graduate of Howard University I also understand how my fellow alumnae might walk around with our heads held high and our egos on 10000. However, one thing the HBCU and Howard experience has taught me is to trust but verify. Measure twice and cut once.

As an ardent supporter of women running for office I am elated to see a woman of color run for president after the historic run of Shirley Chisholm. After Hillary Clinton’s historic run in 2016, I think there is an urgent need to have a woman president. Heck we need more women in elected office everywhere. And we definitely need more women of color. But again, it is important that we give Kamala the same critical assessment that we are giving all other candidates, Democrat, Independent and Republican. The blind loyalty and undying support of her candidacy can be exciting if you are going to support her without any consideration of another candidate. But to do so because she went to your school or pledged your sorority is questionable.

Over the last few weeks, several articles have come out about her time as a prosecutor. Some of her actions have been questioned in pieces like The New York Times opinion piece and the article written in The Intercept about her survival as a candidate in the age of the Black Lives Matter movement. These articles point out her stances on controversial cases that some would deem “on the wrong side” of convictions or her silence on stances she might have taken on issues related to criminal justice.  But there are also pieces written that highlight many of her reforms and why she is favorited to get an endorsement by former President Barack Obama.  Notwithstanding her professional experience, which she will have to explain, it would be prudent for all to carefully consider why you support her candidacy over collegiate and social group affiliations.  Afterall, attending a ‘proclaimed’ elite university and joining a sorority has yet to prove anyone is ready to become the next president.

This article was originally published on 1 January 2019.

War Taxes and Other Radical Ideas From the Left

Joe Biden is the clear front runner in the Democratic race for the presidential nomination. Regardless of his tone-deaf comments and self-inflicting blunders, his poll numbers haven’t wavered and the race is his to lose. With that being said, nearly every Democrat trailing him is willing to say and do anything to gain traction, including radical ideas and “sound good” policy.

Bernie Sanders, who is second in most polls, just proposed cutting student loan debt, all $1.6 TRILLION. It sounds good, but unrealistic by any measure and a weak attempt to gain traction. Student loan debt can be crippling, and maybe that’s why so many people have quickly jumped on the Bernie bandwagon after he made the announcement… some probably knowing it sounds too good to be true, and others really believing it could happen (if he wins of course). Let’s just say we defer to the former.

If that wasn’t a stretch goal, last week Beto O’Rourke proposed a “war tax”, which would require non-military households (so roughly 99% of the population) to pay a “war tax” to help cover the health care of veterans of newly-authorized wars. Healthcare for veterans, including mental health and other related services for them and their families, should be a primary concern of every White House administration. We can safely say both parties have dropped this ball. But more taxes to address this issue isn’t the answer, and if Beto didn’t know that before his announcement, Twitter quickly confirmed that it’s a nonstarter. While the taxes would be nominal, it’s still a bad idea thrown at an even worse problem.

Household income…

  • Making less than $30,000/year would pay $25
  • Making less than $40,000/year would pay $57
  • Making less than $50,000/year would pay $98
  • Making less than $75,000/year would pay $164
  • Making less than $100,000/year would pay $270
  • Making less than $200,000/year would pay $485
  • Making more than $200,000/year would pay $1,000.

Just a thought… Considering we budget more for our military than the next 7 countries combined, why don’t we start by allocating a small percentage of that to veterans healthcare? I think we’ll have enough… to still say we budget more for our military than the next 7 countries combined. 

DEMOCRATIC DEBATE: PLAY BY PLAY AND OPINION

I watched the debates with as little prejudice and bias as possible. These are my gut reactions as a straight, White, married, 36 years old, religiously unaffiliated, politically independent, male.

20 Candidates. 10 each night. 60 seconds to answer. 30 seconds to follow up.

NIGHT ONE…

ECONOMY:

Elizabeth Warren is up first. She is asked if her economic policies (which are heavily progressive) are appropriate at a time when 70% of country says the economy is up. She makes the point that the economy is top heavy and is working great for the 1%. Trickle-down is not happening. She is very eloquent and on-point.

Amy Klobuchar: She is asked if her policies are too idealistic. She talks about how Trump and his supporters gloat about the economy, but it betrays the bigger picture of student debts and low wages. She talks about making Community College free and getting help for everyone that isn’t in the top 1%. Says ifBillionaires can pay off their yachts (which I assume is speaking about the big bank bailouts), we can pay off Student Debts.

—Already, I can tell that the tone of this debate is going to be “boring” (as Eric Trump tweeted apparently) and policy heavy. This seems like it will be the Democratic position to contrast Trump: less rhetoric and circus theatrics, more substance.

Beto O’Rourke: “This economy has to work for everyone.” Betospeaks Spanish during his time which feels a bit forced (he clearly planned this with his campaign and it feels political in nature). O’Rourke speaks to the big bank bailout of trillions to the 1% (which happened under Bush AND Obama, we must remember – so this talking point which is now 3/3 of the first candidates is an interesting strategy seeing as how it could be at least politically attached to Obama, if not factually).

Cory Booker: Talks about monopolies and corporate consolidation. Says dignity is being stripped from labor. Small businesses can’t compete. Wants aggressive policies in the Ag(riculture) sector to spur the economy. He lives in “black and brown” communities that are not being helped by any current policies of this administration. Says “Haliburton and Amazon pay nothing in taxes” and we need to change that. In regards toanti-Trust laws, he will appoint the judges that will rule appropriately. Says corporate power is growing and that Citizens United has been very bad in regards to furthering government corruption.

Warren response about “Picking winners and losers” by Booker: The laws are in place already, it’s the courage to take on the giants that is needed. “I want to return the government to the people.” Warren is very believable in her appeal to voters that want the government to fight back against the big corporations and work for the everyman.

Julian Castro: “I know what it’s like to struggle.” Speaks to his difficult upbringing. Talks about MOMS. It starts in the home. He would pass the equal rights amendment. Women deserve equal pay for equal work. “If we want to be the most prosperous nation in the 21st century, we need to make sure women are paid what they deserve.” Short and sweet.

Tulsi Gabbard: Enlisted in National Guard after 9/11. She still serves as a Major. She is making these points rather than answering the question (which was about Equal Pay). “Our leaders have failed us, leading us from one regime change to the next.” Wants to take money from fighting endless wars into healthcare, green energy, and protecting environment. Her answer is so short and to the point that there is an awkward pause after she finishes and the moderators scramble to get to the next question (she is very impressive in her content, but robotic/uninspiring in her delivery).

Bill De Blasio: Talks about NYC policy that has made a difference in income inequality: raising benefits, raising income, pre-K for all, more sick days, etc. The battle for the Heart and Soul of the party – yes, we are supposed to be for the people: free college, 70% tax rate on wealthy, supposed to break up big corporations when they aren’t serving our Democracy. We have to be strong, aggressive, progressive… in NYC, we have proven we can do that. There is plenty of money in this world, it’s just in the wrong hands.

John Delaney: We must do real things to help American people and workers. A real wage. Double the tax credit. Raise minimum wage. Paid family leave. Says he’s very different, an entrepreneur who has spent his whole career helping 5,000 small businesses.

Jay Inslee: I’m a Governor. We need Unions. That’s how we increase wages. CEO of McDonald’s makes 2,100x the people who work there. I will put people to work in the jobs of the present and the future. Wind Turbines don’t cause cancer, they cause jobs. America needs to lead the world.

Tim Ryan: Can you promise Manufacturing jobs will come back? Trump told Ohians not to sell their houses and Ryan speaks to all of the Ohio jobs being shipped out to Mexico and China. Trump’s promises were hollow and manufacturing has NOT come back. Top 1% controls 90% of wealth while wages for everyone have not gone up since the 70s.

—After hearing from every candidate, Warren and Gabbard stick out the most as the best candidates. They “appear presidential” (whatever that means… it’s not so much hair/attire/looks so much as confidence, projection, and rhetoric).

Warren: We have let giant corporations do whatever they want for decades now. And their entire focus is profit. If they can save a dollar shipping jobs to Mexico or China, they will. They have no loyalty to USA. We need to go tenfold on R&D for Green Energy. Then corporations can use that tech, but they have to use it in America (similar to NASA developing space tech and businesses using it). Very confident on American ability to bring back jobs and tech.

GENERAL QUESTION: Who would abolish employer health insurance in favor of a government-run plan? Only Warren and De Blasio raise hands.

HEALTHCARE:

Klobuchar: Obama wanted public option, that’s bold. But it would kick Americans off health insurance. We need to tackle pharmaceuticals first. Trump said he’d bring down prices and prices have gone up 2x. He gave 100 billion to pharmaceuticals. “That’s what we call all foam and no beer where I come from.” (chuckles from crowd, I personally cringe at these comedic deliveries from non-comedians). “Pharma thinks they own Washington. Well they don’t own me.”

Warren: “I’m with Bernie on Medicare-For-All.” Medical Bills are biggest reason people go broke. And that’s for people WITH insurance. Medical Companies want to get every dollar they can. They continually fight with patients to squeeze money out of them with no regard to for health or family situations. Medicare-For-All solves this. Health Care is a basic human right and I will fight for it.

Beto: “My goal is to ensure that every American is well enough to live up to their full potential.” Tells a story about a Texas man who will be dead before age of 40 because he doesn’t have healthcare. He wants to get to get to a Public Option for all as soon as possible. County Jail is the biggest healthcare provider. Adds that Women’s Healthcare is essential.

De Blasio: First to chime in out of turn calling out Beto for not acknowledging that Private Insurance isn’t working.

John Delaney: We can’t support bills that will have every hospital close. We can’t just take away Private Insurance altogether. Let’s add an option, not take away options (Medicare Option, I believe he’s talking about).

—All the Democrats acknowledge Healthcare is broken, but only two want Medicare for All to replace private insurance immediately, while everyone else wants to add the option of italong with the private option.

Gabbard: “We are talking about this in the wrong way.” What we should talk about is our objective: Medicare For All. If you look at other countries that have Medicare for All, private sector still plays into it (maybe it’s enhanced care).

Booker: If you don’t have healthcare, you won’t succeed in school, occupation, and at home.

Warren: Insurance Companies last year sucked $23 Billion dollars in profit out of the system and that doesn’t count lobbying and bonuses. There is a lobby that is paying to keep insurance the way it is.

Jay Inslee: It should not be an option to deny women coverage for their right of choice. “I’m the only candidate who has passed laws to ensure this and I’ve passed laws for the public health option as well.”

Klobuchar: There are three women who have fought pretty hard for a woman’s right to choose. The idea is that you use Medicare and Medicaid without insurance and 23 million people will get covered.

Castro: My plan would cover abortion. “I believe in reproductive justice.” First to bring up Trans Women. Talks about Missouri and Georgia assaulting Pro-Choice. Would appoint the judges that protect these rights (although probably every candidate would).

Warren: (Getting a lot of time) Would ensure women have access to EVERYTHING: abortion, birth control, health care. Roe v. Wade is not enough. State after state has undermined the courts. Most of America supports the Court Decision, it needs to be Federal Law.

Booker: (on Drugs). Pharma Companies should be held criminally liable. Will not take contributions from any Pharma Execs or Lobbies because they are a big part of the opioid crisis.

Beto: Pharma Companies have destroyed the country and have no accountability. His administration will hold criminals accountable and get people the help they need.

—Break. So far, I am still most impressed with Warren (who is taking over) and Gabbard. Everyone else has underwhelmed.

IMMIGRATION:

Castro: First candidate to put forward a comprehensive immigration plan. Watching images of immigrants in these conditions (including the two who passed away trying to swim across the border) is sad, but it should also piss us off. He wants a pathway to citizenship. We need a Marshall Plan so people can find safety at home instead of coming to US to seek it.

Booker: Also speaks Spanish to answer. Does not seemed contrived this time since it’s addressing the immediate issue at hand (Beto’s response earlier was to a general question). Wants to pass DACA.

Castro: (Again) “My plan also gets rid of criminalizing desperation. It should be a civil violation.” Section 1325 is justified to separate from their families. Every candidate should support its repeal.

Booker: (Again) Separation from children and family isn’t just at the border. ICE is going into homes creating fear.

De Blasio: As a father, every American should say: “That photo of that child is not America.” We aren’t being honest about the division that is being fomented in this country. Immigrants have NOT created the problems we have. It’s the CORPORATIONS, not the IMMIGRANTS.

This was the first big moment of the night in terms of an emotional plea that is also on message with Democratic Party. De Blasio is trying to make the claim that he knows the party platform.

Beto: We would spare no expense to bring families back together. We would not detain any families fleeing violence. We would implement a family care policy. Free dreamers by making them US Citizens. Invest in Central America so there’s no reason to make the journey.

Castro: Section 1325 is the reason all of these problems are happening. Calls out O’Rourke and says he needs to end this policy (he won’t).

Beto: I introduced legislation to help…

Castro: I’m only talking about this Section.

Beto: We need to rewrite immigration laws.

Castro: It’s just this one law that is the problem. We need to end it and families won’t be separated.

—Castro and Beto are fighting pretty heavily.

Klobuchar: “Immigrants do not diminish America, they are America.” Agrees with Beto, that we have to have some provisions in place for people who violate the law (Section 1325 is meant to help fight “bad actors,” but it’s being abused by Trump administration). This President has gone backwards at a time when we need immigrants.

Ryan: Crime or Civil Offense to cross the border? Agrees with Castro: it’s already established in law to bring illegal items across the border. No need to repeat. “If you go to Guantanamo Bay, there are terrorists who are getting better care than the children at the border.” Why are we not letting Doctors and Nurses go to the border?

—The Trump/Miler policy has been proven to be intentionally cruel to discourage immigration.

Booker: Civil vs. Criminal when it comes to illegal immigration. “Our country has made so many mistakes by criminalizing things: Addiction, Mental Illness, Immigration…” We have a surge at the border with Trump’s policies. We should examine why people come here in the first place.

WHAT WILL YOU DO ON DAY ONE? NO ONE HAS ANSWERED QUESTION:

Inslee: Prevent laws that prevent local Police from turning into ICE Agents. Trump threatened me by saying he’d send refugees. That’s an American tradition (immigrants), not a threat.

IRAN:

Booker: Trump messed up taking us out of Iran deal, now they are threatening. We need to get back into the deal. “When I am President, I will do the best I can to make a better deal with Iran.”

Klobuchar: Obama deal was imperfect, but a good deal. Trump told us we’d get a better deal if we pulled out. Now we are a month away from Iranians blowing the cap on uranium enrichment. I’d negotiate our way back into the agreement and not give unlimited leverage to China and Russia.

—Klobuchar is definitely making her case. Maybe it’s the zeitgeist, but the women are owning this debate.

Gabbard: “Let’s deal with the situation where we are. This chicken-hawk administration has lead us to the brink of war with Iran.” War with Iran would be far more devastating than anything we’ve seen with Iraq. This would turn into a regional war. We have to stand up and say, “No war with Iran.”  Her red line would be military action against our troops. It can’t be just a light spark that provokes the US into war.

—Gabbard is on point with military issues. Her military experience is clutch.

Rachel Maddow and Chuck Todd are now moderating.

PARKLAND FLORIDA / GUN CONTROL:

Warren: When asked about the hundreds of millions of guns out there, Elizabeth Warren talks about 100 town halls and the single hardest question she got was: “When you’re president, how are you going to keep us safe? 7 Children will die today. Not just for mass shootings. They’ll die on sidewalks, playgrounds, people’s backyards… gun violence is a national health emergency in this country.” She suggests universal background checks, more research (and it should be noted that the NRA suppresses gun research that is unfavorable).

Booker: When asked about the buyback program, he first talks about gunshots in his neighborhood. In his neighborhood, seven people were shot last week. Someone he knows was killed with an assault rifle last year. It’s not a policy issue for most Americans, it’s an emergency.

“I’m tired. I’m tired of thoughts and prayers.”

Castro: On active shooter drills and the problem getting worse, Castro talks about being Dad of a 10-year-old girl and the worst thing is thinking your child is safe this not being the case. Castro believes that the White House, Senate, and House will be Democratic in 2021 and the legislation will pass.

Ryan: We need trauma-based care as well as policy.

Beto: When asked about Texans who are single-issue on gun control, Beto talks about all the obvious legislation that are NOT “Democrats coming for your guns.” Young people are changing the laws by organizing.

Klobuchar: Everyone has failed until the kids started talking about it.

Booker: If you need a license to drive a car, you should need a license to own a firearm. Connecticut did it and saw a 40% drop in gun violence and a 15% drop in suicides. In terms of getting anything done, the candidate needs to win 50 votes in the Senate to balance the Supreme Court and start passing an aggressive agenda.

De Blasio: We need a different approach to police in America. Talks about his black son, Dante. Talks about having discussions about race and police. If the Democratic would stop acting like the party of the elites, then they could pressure the working class in red states to support them.

BIPARTISANSHIP:

Warren: On having a plan for Mitch McConnell… “I do.” Democracy means the will of the people matters. Congress has made the country work better for lobbyists and big corporations. The fight starts in the White House and everyone energized in 2020 stays on the front lines in 2021. We must make Congress reflect the will of the people.

Delaney: On doing everything in a bipartisan manner, when asked how, he says we must do everything in a bipartisan manner.

Booker: How to work with McConnell? Talks about building coalitions on criminal justice reform when nobody said they could.

CLIMATE CHANGE:

Inslay: Staked campaign on Climate Change. To start, take away filibuster from Mitch McConnell. Who is gonna make Climate Change the first priority?

Beto: Bring everyone into the solutions and the challenges.

Castro: Puerto Rico was one of his first visits. Everyone should be taken care of.

Delaney: We have a perception problem with the Democratic party. We are not connecting to the people in the middle of the country.

—It’s great that Delaney has identified something that’s fairly obvious, but what is he going to do to make this a “Working Class Party?”

DIVERSITY: 

Gabbard: Apologized to the LGBTQ community when she started her campaign. Why should they trust her now? She says nobody on any level of government should be allowed to tell people who they can and can’t love. When she was young, she held views she no longer holds. She served with LGBTQ service members.

Booker: Talks about LGBTQ Americans and suicides, health issues.

Klobuchar: On what she has done for Black and Latino voters, Klobuchar says her entire career has been devoted to better lives for those people. Better schools, better jobs for minorities. Will make sure everyone can vote. Will work on criminal justice reform.

Castro: Talks about a white terrorist who was apprehended without harm (Dylan Roof), but Eric Garner and others were murdered by police without even committing a crime.

FOREIGN POLICY: 

Beto: We need a united front to achieve our foreign policy aims.

De Blasio: We need the War Powers Act to be respected. President cannot act unilaterally. Even in a humanitarian crisis, we need congressional approval. We learned the lesson in Vietnam that we seem to have forgotten.

Ryan: 12 of 17 years in Congress, has sat on Armed Services Committee. Lesson learned is that we “have to stay engaged.” The question was why are we in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Ryan is railing on Trump’s inability to fill posts.

Gabbard: Makes fun of Ryan. “Are you gonna tell the soldiers, ‘we just have to be engaged?’” She says we need to bring our troops home.

Gabbard and Ryan are arguing about terrorism, Al Quida, and Taliban. Ryan seems hysterical.

Greatest GeoPolitical Threat:

Delaney: China, Nuclear Weapons

Inslay: Donald Trump

Gabbard: Nuclear War

Klobuchar: Iran

Beto: Climate Change

Warren: Climate Change

Booker: Nuclear Proliferation and Climate Change

Castro: China and Climate Change

Ryan: China (stutters on response)

De Blasio: Russia for messing with our Democracy.

MUELLER: 

Beto: Would pursue action against Trump after he leaves office to prove that nobody is above the law. We must begin impeachment now. His DOJ would investigate if impeachment is not pursued.

Delaney: Trump is not above the law. Supports Pelosi’s decisions to not impeach yet. “This President who is lawless should not be above the law.” But does not think the American people care about this issue.

Klobuchar: We must deal with Russia.

FINAL THOUGHTS:

Delaney: On a mission to find the America that has been lost.

De Blasio: It matters that we nominate a candidate who raised the minimum wage to $15, passed universal healthcare, and given early childcare for free.

Inslee: Makes emotional appeal about the Climate Crisis. Claims to be the only candidate to make this the top priority.

Ryan: Ready to play offense. The forgotten Americans need to be heard.

Gabbard: This Government is of, by, and for the rich and powerful. Our Government will usher in the new century with justice, prosperity, and peace for all.

Castro: Speaking Spanish on this stage shows the progress of our country. Will work hard for good health care, good job opportunities, and a good education.

Klobuchar: Listens to people and gets things done. Can win and beat Donald Trump. Has won in reddest of districts. Not the establishment party candidate.

Booker: Has taken on bullies and won, not by showing the worst of who we are, but by being our best.

Beto: Can’t return to the same old approach. This is our moment.

Warren: Born and raised in Oklahoma. Dreamed of being a public school teacher, but her family didn’t have money. But $50 a semester commuter college is what gave her the chance that opened her life. She believes we can make this country, government, economy work for everyone.

 

NIGHT TWO…

HEALTH CARE:

Bernie Sanders up first:

Sanders: On if taxes will go up for the middle class with his health care plans, Sanders goes into his usual rhetoric which he has pioneered. Healthcare for All, Single Payer System. He says the vast majority of the country will pay vastly less than they are now in an SPS. He also loops in eliminating student debt and paying for it by taxing Wall Street. When pressed on if he’ll raise taxes on Middle Class, he says essentially “Yes, but far less in Health Care costs.”

Biden: “Donald Trump thinks Wall Street built America. Working Class Americans built America.” Says we need to return dignity to the Middle Class. Wants to close tax loopholes and eliminate Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthy.

—Sanders and Biden look very old in high definition.

Harris: Comes on strong when asked about “How are we gonna pay for it?” by talking about how nobody asked this question when Trump and GOP passed tax cuts for the rich. Single Payer. Anyone under $100,000 should get $500 tax credit a month and she wants to repeal the Trump Tax cuts.

John Hickenlooper: “If we don’t define very clearly that we are NOT socialists, Republicans will label us socialists.” He believes Healthcare if a right, not a privilege, but you can’t eliminate Health Insurance for millions and millions right away. Touts his state’s progressive achievements. “I’ve done what everyone else up here is talking about doing.”

Sanders: On a “Socialist” not being able to defeat Trump… dodges question and talks about being 10 points up on Trump because he is a liar, a racist, and has not even fulfilled his campaign promises. “We beat Trump by exposing him for the fraud that he is.”

Kirsten Gillibrand: There’s a difference between capitalism and greed. When ending Gun Violence, it’s the greed of NRA that makes progress impossible. It’s the greed of the drug companies when we want to change prices or get Healthcare for All. We just don’t want corrupted capitalism.

Michael Bennet: Agrees with Bernie on challenges. 40 years with no economic growth. Disagrees with Medicare For All. We need to get to Universal Healthcare, but we should do it by starting with the Public Option first and let people decide.

Gillibrand cuts in and is shut down.

Pete Buttigieg: Does not believe in free college entirely. It does not make sense for working-class families to subsidize rich kids to go to college. It should be affordable to go to college, it should also be affordable to not go to college, we should raise the minimum wage.

Andrew Yang: Asked on how to pay a universal basic income, says a Value Added Tax would add $800 Billion, along with taxing companies like Amazon properly who don’t pay anything. Technology is automating away millions and millions of jobs and AI/Automation/Robots are going to eventually take away millions more job.

Eric Swalwell: “We must value our schools, invest in America’s communities.” Takes a heavy shot at Joe Biden who he quotes as saying “We must pass the torch to a younger generation,” years ago.

Biden fires back: “I’m holding onto that torch.”

The stage erupts – everyone wants to respond to this. It’s chaos. This is the problem with 10 candidates on stage.

Sanders is loudest and gets in: “Who has the guts to take on Wall Street, to take on Pharma, etc.”

Then more loud shouting.

Harris comes in strong: “America doesn’t want to witness a food fight, they want to know how to put food on their table.”

Harris: How are you measuring this economy? The stock market? Most Americans don’t own stocks. Job numbers? People are working 2-3 jobs and suffering for it! They are not happy.

Asks the same question about abolishing private health insurance in favor of a government-run plan.

3 Candidates raise their hands.

Gillibrand: “I ran on Medicare for All and I won.” Single Payer is a right, not a privilege. The fastest way there is by competing with private insurers. If the Government can provide a better option, people will leave the private option.

Buttigieg: How do you explain how you’re getting from here to there. “Medicare for all who want it.” If we are right, then it will be more efficient and less expensive. But let’s remember, in countries that have outright socialized medicine, there is still a private sector. “This is personal to my father was terminally ill.”

Biden: Also says, “This is personal to me.” Talks about his personal healthcare issues and his family’s. Thinks we should build on Obamacare.

—Buttigieg is strong, Harris is strong. Sanders is the same as the last 30 years which is an enormous achievement. He absolutely speaks about the moral and substantive deficiency of corporatized medicine.

Sanders: I find it hard to believe that every major country in the world has figured it out, but we can’t. All insurance and healthcare companies today are trying to make billions. We are paying the highest costs in the world for prescription drugs while pharma makes billions.

Marianne Williamson: We can’t beat Donald Trump by having plans. We have to go deeper. Says we only talk about sickness after people are sick, not before. It has to do with chemical policies, environmental, food, drug, etc.

Bennet: Families should have the choice of Public Option. Talks about having prostate cancer. Sanders will ban all other health insurance under his “Medicare For All” except cosmetic surgery.

Sanders: Doesn’t directly respond to Bennet’s criticism.

Harris: Tells the story of parents who go to emergency rooms and know their child will possibly die, but they can’t walk through the doors or they will be bankrupt.

More yelling.

Another Healthcare Question:

Raise your hand if your government would provide coverage for undocumented immigrants.

Everyone raises their hand.

Why?

Buttiegieg: Our country is healthy when everyone is healthy. We shouldn’t have 11,000,000 undocumented citizens. American people want them to have a path to citizenship so they can pay into the system and receive its benefits. Washington can’t seem to deliver on what the American people want.

Biden: You cannot let people who are sick go uncovered, it has to be taken care of. It’s the humane thing to do.

First break.

It’s a tough call so far. Swalwell, Gillibrand, Yang, Bennett, and Williamson are getting buried.

IMMIGRATION:

Harris: Asked what specific thing she would do about the people coming to the USA for asylum, she would start with reinstating DACA status and protection. She would extend protections for the parents. Undocumented people who are veterans will be taken care of. “I will release children from cages. I will shut down detention centers.” She will use the President’s microphone, “Her microphone,” for good. Trump does not reflect our values.

—Harris was super strong on this issue.

Hickenlooper: Day 1, what does he do? Starts by not answering the question, but talks about how tragic it is that the Federal Government is kidnapping people essentially. Then talks about putting facilities in place to make sure women and children are taken care of at the border.

Williamson: It is kidnapping. This is child abuse. Both are a crime. If your government does it, that doesn’t make it less of a crime. What President Trump has done is not only attacked these children and demonized these immigrants, he has attacked America’s identity at its core.

Gillibrand: Talks about all the horrible things Trump has done. To solve, says similar things: DACA back in, appoint immigration-friendly judges. Stop spending money on for-profit prisons.

Should it be civil offense instead of a federal crime?

Buttigieg: Republican party likes to cloak itself in the language of Religion. Talks about the hypocrisy of Republicans. “God would smile at putting kids in cages?” Mayor Pete gets an enormous response on talking about GOP Religious BS.

Biden: Would put billions in help toward the region (Central America). During term, Obama/Biden focused on issue and it worked. $740 Million towards helping this problem. No more children separation. Ever.

Obama/Biden administration deported more than 3 Million Americans.

Biden: We shouldn’t be locking people up. We should be examining why they are leaving in the first place.

Sanders: “I agree with a lot of what Kamala said.” Honduras has massive corruption. We’ve got to invite the leaders of Central American countries and work with them.

Swalwell: If someone’s only offense is not having proper documents, they should not be deported. They can still be a part of this great country.

Harris: Absolutely do not deport these people. Harris disagreed with Obama Administration on very few things, this was one. As Attorney General of California, she said that Sheriffs did not have to comply with detainers and only act in the interest of public safety.

TRADE: 

Starts with China. Talks about them manipulating currency.

Bennet: Biggest national security issue is Russia, not China. But on China, President is right to push back on China, but he’s done it the wrong way. Also addresses border issue and talks about his Mom being separated in Poland during Holocaust.

Bennet comes on strong here, but it’s strange because the topic has passed (another problem with the many candidates).

Yang: Agrees that Russia is greatest geopolitical threat because they have been hacking our elections and “Laughing their asses off” about it. China is a huge problem because of stealing intellectual property and pirating. “We need to crack down on Chinese malfeasance in the relationship.”

Buttigieg: The Chinese challenge is a serious one. They are using technology for the perfection of dictatorship. Tariffs aren’t going to solve this. China is about to run circles around us on Artificial Intelligence. The biggest thing we need to do is invest in our own industrial and technological competitiveness.

Buttigieg gets a huge round of applause.

RACE: 

Buttigieg: Asked about police shootings and lack of black police officers. Takes full responsibility for the problems in South Bend right now. Talks about the bigger racial divides and trying to ensure that in the future, white and black people react the same to seeing a police officer.

Hickenlooper: Talks about actual reforms in Colorado that worked for police accountability.

Swalwell tells Buttigieg he should have fired the Chief because he’s the Mayor.

Williamson: The average American is not a racist, but the average American is woefully ignorant of racist issues.

Harris: Owns the issue on race. “A neighbor told her kids they couldn’t play with us because we were black.” Tells Biden she does not believe he is a racist and commends him for trying to find common ground. But it was hurtful to hear him talk positively about two Senators who built their reputations on being racists. This subject is not an intellectual subject. Police Officers should have body cameras on and keep them on.

—Coming into the debate, I was not impressed with Harris in terms of excitement and rhetoric. She has won me over as a completely viable candidate here.

Biden responds very weakly, trying to tout his accomplishments.

Harris is on fire attacking Biden. Biden is on his heels.

DIVERSITY: 

Sanders: Democrats lead on diversity, but we should not focus on this issue as much as fighting special interests

Gillibrand and Bennet do not seem in control although they are sound in their policy and rhetorical mastery.

Bennet: On if gridlock will disappear. Says it will never disappear as long as Mitch McConnell is there.

Biden: Touts his record again. Talks about getting the bailout passed. Talks about bailing out the auto industry.

I used to really like Buttigieg and Harris, but now I like Harris/Buttigieg.

ABORTION: 

Sanders: Woman’s right to choose is a constitutional right. “I will never appoint anyone to Supreme Court that doesn’t defend Roe v. Wade.” Thinks we should rotate judges.

Gillibrand makes an emotional appeal to Women in this country and the Men who love them. She is tired of playing defense and thinks we should play offense. Touts her record on abortion. A little all over the place.

CLIMATE: 

Harris: “I don’t call it Climate Change, it’s a Climate Crisis.” Supports Green New Deal, Paris Agreement reentry. Trump is the greatest threat to national security.

Buttigieg: We must prevent Climate Change for getting worse. Carbon tax. Buttigieg had to use emergency procedures for flooding in Indiana. With the right kind of soil management, rural America can really be a part of the solution.

Hickenlooper: As a scientist, does not think Socialism is the solution. In Colorado, they’ve worked with the oil and gas industries and have improved the State’s climate situation. We can’t demonize businesses.

Biden: On cutting carbon emissions without Congress, does not answer the question, but talks about going to a fully electric vehicle future. Would invest $400 million in science research.

Sanders: This is a global issue. Scientists say we have 12 years before there is irreparable damage. We need to transform the country’s energy system to renewable, green energy.

Swalwell: “Pass the torch.”

Williamson: John Kennedy said, “We are gonna put a man on the moon.” Stay inclusive. Don’t try to win an election, try to

What’s the one issue that you get passed through?

Swalwell: Ending gun violence

Bennet: Climate Change

Gillibrand: Family Bill of Rights

Harris: Middle-Class Tax Cut

Sanders: Doesn’t take the bait, but says take on Special Interests.

Biden: Doesn’t agree with the premise, but defeat Donald Trump

Buttigieg: Take on Money in Politics

Yang: Universal Basic Income

Hickenlooper: Climate Change

Williamson: Make America a place where a girl can grow up.

GUNS: 

Swalwell: We have NRA on the ropes, but I’m the only candidate who wants buy backs for 15 Million Guns. He is impassioned here, but it’s still very political.

Sanders: Is quoted directly and said he was mischaracterized (audience laughs at this). Sanders touts his D- voting record from NRA. Wants comprehensive gun legislation. End gun show loopholes. Assault weapons are from the military, don’t belong on the streets.

Harris: Agrees with Swalwell and says there are many great ideas, but wants congress to put together a bill in the first 100 days or she will ban by executive order the sale of assault weapons. She talks about seeing more damage done by gun violence than anyone as a prosecutor.

Buttigieg: With military experience, asked about military families having a different take on this. “We trained on these kinds of weapons.” If guns made us safe, we’d have the safest country in the world, but it’s not the case. There are weapons that have no place in American cities in peace time.

Biden: “I got Brady Bill passed. I’m the only guy who’s beaten the NRA.” Biden is really on fire here. Talks about Smart Guns that require biometrics to fire.

FOREIGN POLICY: 

Bennet: We must restore Democracy at home. Our current President is corrupt. We must restore our relationships with allies.

On resetting relationships abroad:

Williamson: Would call European leaders.

Hickenlooper: China.

Yang: China. North Korea.

Buttigieg: Who knows who is most insulted by then.

Biden: NATO.

Sanders: United Nations.

Harris: NATO.

Gillibrand: Iran.

Bennet: European Alliance and every Latin American country.

Swalwell: Break up with Russia and make up with NATO.

Biden: asked about Iraq vote. Biden regrets the vote to go in, butwas responsible for getting troops out.

Biden stumbles a lot.

Sanders: Touts his opposition to Iraq war. Wants to solve issue with Saudis and Yemen. Prevent Iran War.

Chuck Todd is super condescending, by the way.

FINAL THOUGHTS: 

Swalwell: Can’t look to the past.

Williamson: Talks about Trump. Will only be beaten by someone who understands that Trump has harnessed fear for political purposes. Love will beat fear.

Bennet: Generational improvement is at risk, that’s why he’s running.

Hickenlooper: Touts Colorado achievements. Don’t need a big government to do big things. Socialism will reelect Trump.

Gillibrand: Appeals to Women who are currently under attack.

Yang: Beat Donald Trump by solving the problem that got him elected.

Harris: Talks about prosecuting the case against Trump. Wants to lead with dignity, honesty, and give the American family all that they need to prosper.

Buttigieg: Talks about his personal experience in war, marriage, and office. He wants his generation to solve climate change, racial equality, and endless war.

Sanders: Why has nothing changed? These are all good people on stage. Nothing WILL change unless we take on Wall Street, Pharma, Military Industrial Complex, and Fossil Fuel companies. 

Biden: Wants to restore the soul of our country.

 

SUMMARIES:

NIGHT ONE…

Elizabeth Warren: TOP 3. She’s got the confidence, the policies, the brains, and “looks Presidential.”

Amy Klobuchar: A less exciting Warren.

Beto O’Rourke: Lots of heart, but was clumsy and did not connect.

Cory Booker: Many good things to offer, but doesn’t have the “it” factor.

Castro: Incredibly authentic and likeable, but not tough enough(especially for Trump).

Gabbard: A contender. Needs more time to shine.

De Blasio: Great politician and very bright, but not a serious consideration.

Delaney: Forgettable.

Inslee: Forgettable.

Ryan: Forgettable.

NIGHT TWO… 

Swalwell: Seems to exist only to take out Biden.

Bennet: Forgettable.

Gillibrand: Not electable.

Harris: TOP 3. Very powerful performance. I came into these debates with her as my top pick for VP and now I see her as Presidential.

Sanders: Same Sanders as always. He’s truly someone you’d want to be President, but he seems to come from somewhere else that doesn’t line up with where we are, but where we want to be and this could be risky when this upcoming election needs a sure thing.

Biden: Seems out of it. Fitness is a real issue here.

Buttigieg: TOP 3. Very authentic and in command. He has his own tone in this race and it’s definitely unique, if not completely viable.

Yang: He is hilarious because he just doesn’t seem to care about the politics of it all. He’s stoically confident in his positions to the point of seeming like he doesn’t care if you agree with him or not because it won’t change the truth (which he knows). I like him a lot, but there’s no chance for this guy to win politically despite his vast intellect.

Hickenlooper: Forgettable.

Williamson: She is not representative of most Americans. She reeks of coastal elite. (She’s also incredibly brilliant, original, and entertaining…)

Critiquing the Candidates

Record, platform, and history do matter in the Democratic primary, and pointing out the differences does not harm the candidates, it strengthens the team. 

20 candidates have declared their run for the Democratic Party nomination for the 2020 presidential election. That’s a massive list filled with candidates from different backgrounds, different experiences, different platforms, and different visions for the future. Already, conversations and social media comment boards are filled with opinions on who the front-runner is, who has the ability to sustain a run, or who can unite the party. Also included in these discussions (arguments), is why one should never criticize another candidate by bringing up their record or any other unfriendly information for fear that Democrats will weaken their own eventual nominee. Comments such as, “Democrats eat their young again,” or “here we go again with Democrats badly damaging each other -save it for the general election!” Not only is this idea unfair, but it is misguided and will lead to a flawed nominee rather than a strengthened team.

In 2016, there were two candidates for the Democratic nomination, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. The argument that Sanders damaged Clinton and her ability to win in the general election has been proven false by many metrics. Hillary Clinton, largely, ran a campaign for the presidency that lacked substance and a clear vision. Mostly, she ran on a platform of ‘I’m not Trump.’ She failed to energize voters and create a high voter turnout, particularly among young people. Verified exit polling numbers show that the 18-29 year old demographic only created 13% of the electorate, with roughly 29% of the electorate coming from the demographics of 30-49 years old, 50-64 and 65+, however, all four of these demographics represent about the same population. Further, Bernie Sanders could have 1 created a contested convention and required super delegates to cast the final nominating votes, which many of his supporters probably would have liked considering the ethically questionable things the DNC did during the primary season, but he stood on stage and waited for five minutes for the cheering to subside before conceding the nomination to Hillary Clinton. He then campaigned on her behalf for the rest of the election, across the country and using his extensive network to urge his supporters to get out and cast a ballot for Hillary Clinton for president. During the 2016 primary season, there were no negative ads run by Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders, or vice versa. Neither of the Democratic candidates ever told their supporters to vote against the other should they win the nomination, or not to vote at all. But, what they did do is to expose the Democratic electorate to truths about each others history, past voting records and what they would do differently. The impetus was on the nominee to excite the Democratic base, get out the vote and create a platform that people would want to vote for. As has been well documented, Clinton failed to do this by running a moderate campaign with few specifics except that she would be better than Donald Trump. She did not see what was so exciting for much of the electorate in a candidate like Sanders or, in a much different way, Trump, and did not speak to these people about what they needed from the government. She avoided states like Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan because they have been reliably Democratic – and she lost 2⁄3 of them. She did not create a campaign that felt authentic to Americans who don’t believe politicians are authentic, and she lost because of it.

Bernie Sanders offered Hillary Clinton an opportunity to be in touch with the electorate, to answer for a voting record that many Americans viewed as questionable, and to create a platform for the general election that would appeal to further voting blocs than what Democrats have traditionally enjoyed. He offered her a stronger campaign, but she did not capitalize on it – this does not mean he harmed her campaign. Similarly, in the current primary season, the Democrats and their supporters, are going to expose the history, experience, voting records, policy stances and many other things about each other. While this absolutely must remain civil and rooted in fact, and there should be no negative ads run against each other, the sheer breadth of candidates is going to open additional voting blocs to the eventual nominee, should they have the vision and insight to see it and act on it. By listening to the voters, who they donate to, who they show up for at rallies, what policies they like and don’t like, and being able to speak to those voters in the general election, the nominee will be strengthened. By having their ‘dirty laundry’ aired out in the primary, they will have an opportunity to formulate an answer for it, evolve on unpopular stances, and adapt their platform to reach more voters. If a fair, honest and open election is held, no Democratic voter should be able to say the nominee does not represent them when all is said and done, and a formidable candidate will represent the team in the general election. 

1 “An examination of the 2016 electorate, based on validated voters ….” 9 Aug. 2018, https://www.people-press.org/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-vote rs/. Accessed 29 Apr. 2019. 

This article was originally published on 1 May 2019.

Mexico, Tariffs, and Accountability

Stop me if you heard this before: “POTUS makes a short notice international policy demand that is difficult to achieve and obtain measures of effectiveness or performance.”

As the deadline approaches, he claims a deal is reached and gets “credit for a political win.” Fast forward a few days and we learn the claimed deal was actually achieved months prior.

That’s where we are following the “new migrant policy deal” with Mexico. Our POTUS has claimed an achievement but the chances you’ve heard this is an old deal packaged as new are based on your political leanings only. In a day and time the initial story matters more than truth, it is now more important than ever that media (left, center and right) do the job they signed up for and push back whether it benefits their bias or not.

Take for instance the state of Michigan where a woman (Cathy Garnaat) attending a town hall by Republican Representative Justin Amash. For the first time, she heard there actually was negative information on Trump in the Mueller Report. Had she not been an Amash supporter, to this day (Deontay Wilder voice) she would not know this.

We exist in a bubble now more than ever. Funny in the Information Age, you can isolate yourself from information, but that is where we are. We are in a time where disinformation is standard practice and both parties as well as the media aids an administration that knows as long as they put their spin out first, the facts no longer matter.

My takeaway from the “new deal” with Mexico and the telling signs around it; this is how you sit and watch a system collapse when accountability and truth no longer matters. 

Similar Read: Newspeak

Joe Biden Doesn’t Deserve Your Vote

Last week former Vice President and leading Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden flip-flopped on his support of the Hyde Amendment, the 1970’s legislation which bars the use of federal funds to pay for abortion except to save the life of the woman or if the pregnancy results from incest or rape.

Abortion and related healthcare services can be costly; therefore, this amendment significantly affects poor women and women of color.

“The problem is, the Hyde Amendment affects poor women, women of color, Black women, Hispanic women. And women of color will elect the next president of the United States.” – Patti Solis Doyle, former campaign manager for Hillary Clinton in 2008

Patti Doyle is right, yet Biden remained consistent in his support of the amendment. His opponents, including Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, lined up to criticize his stance and support for the bill. And before the end of the week, after initially doubling down in support of the bill, Biden reversed his stance and denounced his support.

“If I believe healthcare is a right as I do, I can no longer support an amendment that makes that right dependent on someone’s zip code.” – Joe Biden

Biden has a long documented history of defending this bill often citing his Catholic faith and that he doesn’t believe taxpayers who don’t believe in abortion should be forced to pay for them. So we should believe that he quickly realized this amendment disproportionately impacts poor women and women of color, many of whom are Democratic voters, amidst many of these Republican abortion bans sweeping the nation, and therefore he no longer supports it? A moral conundrum, maybe. Either way, after supporting a bill for 40+ years, it’s a stretch to believe he had a change of heart within 48-72 hours. Clearly, winning the Democratic nomination is more important, and that’s politics. 

But this isn’t the first time he’s been on the wrong side of politics and history specifically in regard to women of color and disadvantaged communities… his troubling comments on desegregation and busing, his treatment of Anita Hill, and his role in the 1994 crime bill, just to name a few. Add the Hyde Amendment to that list.

The nostalgia of Biden serving as VP for the nation’s first Black President should take a back seat to many of his actions and legislative decisions over his political career, actions and decisions which have negatively impacted the Black community. Considering the Hyde Amendment negatively affects the same groups of people he depends on for votes, poor women and women of color, a Democrat supporting this bill for decades is inexcusable and not worthy of the highest office in the land. 

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act, a controversial bill that criminalizes abortion and attempted abortion, was enacted on May 15th, 2019. This act categorizes abortion as homicide and a Class A felony while attempted abortion is now considered a Class C felony. Section 2 letter I, compare the casualties of the Holocaust, the Soviet Regime, and the Rwandan genocide to the estimated “50 million babies… aborted in the United States since Roe v. Wade passed in 1973.” The legislation also defines an unborn child, child, or person as “a human being, specifically including an unborn child in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability.” It also defines a woman as “a female human being, whether or not she has reached the age of maturity”, (House Bill 314, section 3). One of the most problematic aspects of the bill includes the lack of exception for abortions in the case of impregnation through rape or incest. The passing of the law has resulted in backlash along with praise from those who agree with the legislation.

Not only is this bill incredibly heinous for its lack of empathy but for its lack of inclusion. HB 314 denies any person that is able to get pregnant the choice to terminate that pregnancy, but specifically protects women or “female” people from criminal charges if the mother’s life is at risk. While it is possible for any person of any gender to receive an abortion, this rhetoric does not allow the same protections for trans and non-binary folk, only cis-gender women. Ericka Hart, a queer Black femme, activist, and an accomplished teacher of sex education discusses the dangers that go beyond the bill itself. She states, “One day, people are sharing about abortion being a “women’s issue” – intentionally leaving out trans people and the next day, they are sharing about the death of Black trans women. If the only time you talk about trans existence is when we are gone, you aren’t helping”. Ericka’s studies and work focus on the systemic and historical events that allow for White supremacist, sexist, transphobic and homophobic bills to pass.

This bill will have a significant impact on poor minorities specifically when Black maternal death is a profound and prevalent issue, and currently at an all-time high. There is little to no access to contraception and proper sex education for the impoverished. While the wealthy and middle class can afford birth control, condoms and emergency contraceptives these products are not accessible to people without sufficient income or insurance. When rhetoric like “pro-life” is used it demonizes people who get abortions by implying that they are anti-life or pro-murder. The use of this language creates stigma for people who have already had abortions as well as those in need of an abortion. This stigma leads to shame and isolation which can end in lethal circumstances. To take away the right to a sterile and proper abortion puts countless lives at risk and puts immense financial stress on families. Prioritizing a life that has not yet begun over a life that has current meaningful existence and relationships is hypocritical. The right using the term “pro-life” is a manipulation tactic born out of the desperate need to maintain power and control.

The abortion ban in Alabama brings attention to a lot of systemic issues that plague many government bodies and society as a whole. It is important for the public to be educated correctly on whom these bills affect the most. Unfortunately, the attention tends to gravitate towards the most privileged and powerful leading to the silencing and erasure of marginalized voices. This ban will have negative effects on many and in some cases lead to life-threatening or lethal circumstances. In times like this, it is vital to prioritize those who face immediate danger in the rise of this ban. Audre Lorde, a Black, lesbian, poet, and educator stated, “The master’s tool will never dismantle the master’s house.” This quote remains relevant and impactful in the present. It can help to explain how powerful structures have maintained control and are able to pass an oppressive and dangerous bill like HB 314. If radical and revolutionary means are not taken society cannot progress and the marginalized will continue to suffer at the expense of our collective silence.

Ericka Hart: Twitter, Instagram 

Similar Read: Legal Attack on Women’s Rights to Choose (How Did We Get Here?)

Legal Attack on Women’s Right to Choose (How Did We Get Here?)

There is a calculated attack happening across this country. It’s an attack on women and their bodies. In the past month, we have seen state legislative bodies in Missouri, Ohio, and Georgia pass restrictive abortion laws. Last week we saw the Alabama Senate pass a ban and the Governor, Kay Ivey, signed it into law. Georgia’s Governor, Brian Kemp, also signed a controversial abortion bill, the heartbeat bill, into law. But the bill signed by Ivy in Alabama is currently the most restrictive in the country. The bill signed by Ivy bans abortions — with the exception of when the life of the mother is in jeopardy — in all circumstances. Stop and read that sentence again. If a woman is raped or a victim of incest, according to the Alabama law, she must carry it to full term.

This is extreme to say the least. This bill along with the others passed in Georgia, Ohio, and Missouri all seem to be aimed at one thing, getting their legal challenges heard at the Supreme Court. If legal challenges get to that level then Pandora’s box is open for the Roe v. Wade debate.  Ohio passed a fetal heartbeat bill, which would ban a woman from having an abortion once a heartbeat is detected. Some state legislative bodies are even calling it a 6-week ban, a time when some women may not even know they are pregnant. Georgia’s Governor Kemp signed something similar. In Tennessee, the legislative house passed a 6-week heartbeat bill, but it was defeated in the state Senate and sent to summer study, but is likely to be reintroduced next legislative season.

It would be convenient to rant about the way men are legislating over women’s bodies and giving them no chance to discuss or fight back against that legislation. Instead, I want to challenge you to relive a brief rundown of events that have gotten us to 2019 and the heartbeat bills. The breakdown is below:

  1. 2008-2009: America elects the first Black president, Barack Obama. 
  2. Early 2010: SCOTUS rules in ‘Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC)’ that political spending is a form of free speech that’s protected under the First Amendment. The controversial 5-4 decision effectively opened the door for corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money to support their chosen political candidates. Hate that your politicians are bought and sold by corporations? Blame this.
  3. Late 2010: Ahead of the midterms, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell vows to make President Obama a “one-term president” and Republicans declare a nationwide takeover of state legislatures. This begins the slow but steady Republican calculation to take over.
  4. 2010 Midterms: Thanks to the Citizens United case, Republicans flood the airwaves with political advertising to influence down-ballot elections. Republicans pick up 675 state legislative seats; swept several governorships, including Tennessee; and Republican control increased from 14 states to 26 state legislatures. They also take control of the U.S. House of Representatives, winning 58 seats.
  5. 2011: Now that Republicans effectively have the states on lock, states begin to enact strict voter ID laws, including Alabama, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas, and TN.
  6. 2012: President Obama is re-elected. All is well with the world because we now have the Affordable Care Act (aka: Obamacare) and our president is still Black.
  7. 2013: The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) guts the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in the ‘Shelby County v. Holder’ case. As in, Shelby County, Alabama versus Attorney General Eric Holder. As in, the (same) Voting Rights Act championed by Civil Rights activists like Dr. Martin Luther King and Congressman John Lewis. The ruling basically said, nope racism doesn’t exist anymore so Southern states no longer need permission (i.e. “preclearance”) from the federal government to change their voting laws. The decision allowed 846 jurisdictions to close, move or change the availability of local polling places (mostly in predominantly African American counties) without federal oversight. There were also cuts to early voting and purges of voter rolls. Virtually all restrictions on voting after the ruling were by Republicans.
  8. 2014: Things begin to take a turn for the worst. Republicans continue their congressional takeover during the 2014 midterms. Republicans gained control of U.S. Senate and picked up more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.
  9. Early 2016: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia dies. His death begins the conversation about who will replace him and President Obama is granted option to choose. Obama chooses Merrick Garland, but both the Republican senators and Democratic senators have to vote on his nomination. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocks the nomination, claiming it’s too close to a presidential election so the next president should pick. 
  10. Late 2016: Donald Trump is elected president. Now Republicans are in control of the legislative branch and executive branch. Time to take over the judicial branch.
  11. 2017: Trump has his eye on the SCOTUS pick left vacant by Obama. 
  12. By nominating conservative judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. (Remember, elections have consequences, and in 2014, just 36.4% of eligible voters nationwide turned out in 2014 – the lowest since World War II—and Republicans gained control of the Senate, who confirms all federal judges.)
  13. Fast forward to 2018 and by now, 34 states have some form of voter ID laws. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announces his retirement. Trump nominates Brett Kavanagh as his replacement. Senate confirms Kavanaugh in October, shortly before the midterms, solidifying the bench as a reliably conservative 5-4 majority.

It’s now 2019 and Republicans control the state legislature in 31 states. That is over half the country. Congress is divided – Democrats took back the House in 2018, but Republicans still control the Senate, Presidency, and Supreme Court.

What we are seeing play out today is a deliberate playbook, run by American Legislative Executive Council, also known as ALEC. This is the conservative right-wing organization that essentially creates all the bills and runs them through state legislative, congressional and Senate bodies across this country. They can’t do it unless our elected officials agree to push their proposed legislation. It’s interesting to note that ALEC will pay for members of Congress to attend some of their meetings where they discuss policy and legislation. Elected officials then go back to their respective seats and run their (ALEC) bills. Ultimately, the bills introduced by legislative branches across the country are so egregious and blatantly unconstitutional in an attempt to move the battle to friendly territory – the courts. And we see this happening with the abortion bills across the South. And in case you want even more examples let’s take another look at some recent history and see how there is calculation about the process of moving controversial legislation to the court system.

As soon as Trump became president he introduced the Muslim travel ban. A few judges across the country struck it down because they believed it was unconstitutional. It is now an active open court battle, but the dangerous part is Trump has already had two successful appointees to the Supreme Court and has been placing members on the Circuit Courts as well. This is important to note because states can fight these laws and challenge them, but if they end up in a court where a judge has been appointed by Trump or has a conservative view of the law then these abortion laws could be upheld along with other extreme laws coming out of Republican-led legislatures.

Trump has called for the separation of migrant families at the border. Again, this is something that judges are challenging and it’s heading to legal proceedings within the judicial system. The Secretary of Education, Betsy Devos, and her team are challenging public education with school vouchers. Legal proceedings will take place. Again, this will be headed to the courts. Voter registration is also under attack in states like Tennessee pushing the envelope and criminalizing the civic act. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is suing and guess where this will end up, in court. And let’s not forget about the 2020 census. The President is trying hard to remove some provisions on how Americans are counted, which will affect funding for states. There are lots of unknowns about the upcoming census, but one thing that will likely take place – a court battle.

When we talk about the calculated attack on women and their bodies, we have to look at how long this has been in play. The attack on abortion laws are systematically set up to eventually end up in the Supreme Court in an attempt to overturn Roe v. Wade. We should be upset about abortion bans. Louisiana has a case before the Supreme Court and we should all pay close attention to its outcome. It’s a law that would force doctors to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of where an abortion is performed, a structure that those opposed to the law insist violates the “undue burden” notion. In 2016 the state of Texas had a similar bill struck down in court.

We will begin to see court cases pop up about abortion bans because as soon as they are signed, they will immediately be appealed. It will be up to state judges, first, to decide their fate and with the stacking of conservative judges across the country we can only hope women’s right to choose is just as important to them as forcing a woman to carry an unwanted baby that the government doesn’t want to financially support once it gets here. 

We Care So Much, That You Have No Rights

A point of view from a frustrated man who’s questioning other men’s point of view.

I just finished reading an article written by a fellow contributor to The LCR, Cynthia Swiss: Alabama Abortion Is Taking Women Back To The Dark Ages. After reading the article, I had to take a moment and gather my thoughts and emotions because I agreed with every point Cynthia had made in her article. Having had the pleasure and honor of being raised and guided by powerful, empowering, no-nonsense women all my life, taking a moment to fully understand the consequences of the abortion ban and how so many other states in the MidWest are following suit gave me pause.

It’s a surreal moment when you take a step back and look in realizing that there are so many women out there and young girls now that will have to live in more fear than before. Not only is their God-given right to maintain, manage and decide what to do with their bodies being stripped away before our very eyes, but now even rape and incest seem to lose their severity in consequences.  

Why? because the only person that seems to indeed pay for it will be women, regardless of the situation, unless her life is in danger. Really? That’s the best we can do? That’s how we show our intelligence, respect, appreciation, and understanding of women in America? By telling them, they have NO choice but to carry pregnancies to term, because we care about life?

LOL, wait… that’s the reason? Really? WE CARE ABOUT LIFE? Oh man, we are unique, aren’t we? I mean, this is Gold. WE CARE ABOUT LIFE… We care so much about life that we bomb indiscriminately hospitals, schools, and population-centric areas that are FILLED with children to protect our “interests.”

We care so much about life, that the moment the child is born, we stop caring. Because the goal is to bring more life on this planet right, strictly? I mean, who cares if the mother can raise the child, emotionally, financially, or mentally. WE CARE ABOUT LIFE. THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS!

I mean, we care so much that we lock up immigrant children in detention camps and facilities where they are abused and RAPED! Because We care.

We care so much about life, that if a woman is raped or is a victim of incest, her ability to be supported, emotionally and mentally to recover as well as be given justice for such a heinous act is not essential. Because the “life” she is carrying IS meaningful, so her ability to have a say on her body or to have support from the government, or the law is irrelevant. 

Look, I hold no influence on you, the reader, or anyone else except myself. Moreover, as a man, the craziest thing about this issue is that I have complete control over what is done or how it is done to my body in every conceivable way! However, the opposite sex is having all their liberties and rights questioned and taken away. 

We do not have the right to control what a woman does, or does not do with her body. Why it is taking us close to 5,000+ years to understand that and accept? That is probably one of the many reasons why my frustration with the human race grows a little more with every passing year. Especially when such draconian measures are taken to control, dictate, and humiliate those that our race biologically, emotionally, mentally, and physically cannot do without – Women. 

Similar Read: ALABAMA ABORTION BAN IS IS TAKING WOMEN BACK TO THE DARK AGES

ALABAMA ABORTION BAN IS TAKING WOMEN BACK TO THE DARK AGES

As the news of the Alabama abortion ban reached my ears, I got shivers down my entire body. A body that I own, that I cherish–most days at least–, a body I now realize that some men think doesn’t actually belong to me.

Back in the Middle Ages, men were actually convinced women, dripping blood once a month, were the incarnation of Satan, orgasms were a devilish force men were warned not to release and the uterus was held responsible for every strange ailment women seemed to be so prone to displaying, such as… sadness. You would think people in 2019 know better. You would be mistaken then.

By denying women the right to own their bodies and to decide whether or not they feel ready to bring a child into this world, these men bring us back to these dark ages of ignorance and cruel patriarchy. By excluding rape and incest as valid reasons to deny women, and unfortunately sometimes girls, the right to overcome nature and make a rational decision, these men show how little they know about women, abortion and health. By implementing the heartbeat rule, they demonstrate their lack of awareness of basic biology. Unless you’ve been trying for a baby and are taking pregnancy tests regularly, or have a very regular cycle, 6 weeks is often the moment the pregnancy is discovered. I was 8 weeks pregnant when my gynecologist told me there was no heartbeat. After enduring a very traumatic surgical procedure to clear my uterus, as I was crying my heart out my (male) therapist told me, “You haven’t lost a baby. You’ve lost a fetus.” So it’s fine to rationalize when nature takes its course, but not when a woman takes control of her body? I never went back to this therapist. To this day, it remains one of the most unacceptable things I’ve been told because when you deeply want a baby, or when you get pregnant and feel ready to be a mother, the baby is not only in your belly, but also in your head, in your dreams, in your future.

On the other hand, when the pregnancy is not wanted or can’t be carried out willingly, it turns into a nightmare or a haunting dilemma. What should be taken into account is the potential wreckage of two lives, maybe more, compared to the benefits of constraining a woman to give birth. By refusing to acknowledge most women seeking abortions, especially in searing-poor areas and countries, are victims, and will probably struggle to come to terms with what they had to do, these men confirm that they, in fact, are not men: they are self-entitled idiots with bigotry-caked brains. Sadly, one of them was elected president of the United States, and rallied his peers, swarming over progress like maggots over an open wound. By refusing to accept that men are responsible for their own bodies as well perpetuates a supremacy based on one thing, and one thing only: the medieval fear of women.

Whether a rapist needs a knife, a gun or his hands around a woman’s neck to gain access to her genitals, whether an uncle or a family friend need threats and promises to convince a little girl not to tell anyone that they share a very special secret, whether a husband or boyfriend refuses the use of contraception or press for one more child, whether any religious leader or authority pretends that birth control is against His law, they are all committing the same act of violence against the very beings on whose existence our survival depends. Contraception does not always work, doctors are sometimes wrong, timing may not be adequate, and these are only a tiny portion of the reasons that may lead a woman to end a pregnancy. And you can take my word that any woman who had to undergo this is somehow scarred. Even if she knows there was nothing else she could do. The pro-life argument has to be about the woman in the first place, and empowering girls, giving them the assurance they can choose what is best for them, providing easy and safe access to contraception, ensuring both boys and girls get adequate sex-ed and the right talks on consent, mutual respect and dignity is the only way abortion numbers will fall. Criminalizing abortions will result in tragic deaths, suicides or illegal abortions. Angel makers will operate in backrooms at the cost of human lives, again.

Actress Alyssa Milano suggested a sex strike. What if tomorrow women decided to go on reproductive strike? What if the access to a woman’s reproductive organs were denied indefinitely? What if women decided to force vasectomy on all men by passing a bill stating that males don’t know what they’re doing with themselves and need to be put under strict control, without exception? Or what if we decided to offer these men the Godly mission of caring for all those abandoned children waiting for parents in orphanages? After all, that would solve so many problems, all at once. I have never, ever, heard of a place where men abide by women’s decisions regarding their sexuality. I wish such a place didn’t exist, to be honest. Because the only person who is allowed to make decisions regarding their body and organic functions is the person who lives in that body. Women need to stick together and fight back against this retrograde oppression. And if there’s one thing that is even more unbelievable than a bunch of male politicians imposing such a senseless decision in order to “protect life”, it is women sharing their point of view.

At some point in my life, I had to make the hardest decision of all. I did get an abortion. My doctor had told me there was no way I would ever get pregnant without strong medication. I had already had a miscarriage, so after years of infertility, it felt as if nature was playing the cruelest trick on me. With a future father who chickened out of the picture as fast and sneakily as he could, a family who was appalled at the situation and studies to complete, my choice was the rational one. I was not going to make so many people, including an innocent child, suffer. I still think about it when I look at my beautiful sons, who wouldn’t have been born if I hadn’t made this heartbreaking decision back then. Nurses, doctors, anesthesiologists, counsellors… they were all sorry for me and knew how lonely and desperate I was. A few years later, I sought advice and group therapy helped a lot to appease my grief and guilt. I’m glad and proud to say that in Switzerland, there are measures to protect women who seek such procedures, which are performed in hospitals or private clinics (abortion clinics don’t exist) and paid for by health insurance, and no one is hurling abuse at women entering these facilities to make them suffer through their “walk of shame.” If there were, I’d take my sons and my students there to teach them about dignity, freedom and solidarity.